On 2023-07-29 08:18:54, Alif Radhitya Wardana wrote:

>    Based on this changelog, what will happen in the future to SysV? I mean,
>    if systemd forces people to create native systemd units, will people drop
>    sysv scripts on their apps?

>

>    On July 29, 2023 3:20:17 AM GMT+07:00, tito via Dng <dng@???>
>    wrote:

>
> Hi,
> A new, official systemd release (254) has just been tagged:
>

>   * Support for System V service scripts is now deprecated and will be
>     removed in a future release. Please make sure to update your software
>     *now* to include a native systemd unit file instead of a legacy
>     System V script to retain compatibility with future systemd releases.

>
> A wonderful excuse to remove the last init scripts from packages.

Do I have to resurrect my ancient LSB compliant SysV init code that could
figure out dependencies, run things in parallel, and even work with init
"scripts" written in ANY language? It was written as a busybox module,
and could even cope with multiple other init "scripts" as modules in the
same busybox binary. LSB compliance means it reads the headers, which in
typical init scripts are shell comments in the first few lines of the
script.

I could teach it how to grok shitsemDie units.

--
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.