On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 17:16:26 +0100
Manfred Wassmann via Dng <dng@???> wrote:

> On Sunday, July 23, 2023, tito via Dng <dng@???> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 14:31:22 +0100
> > Manfred Wassmann <berlinsight@???> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sunday, July 23, 2023, tito <farmatito@???> wrote:
> > >
> > > > ,
> > > > but we wouldn't be about 9billion people on this planet if the anarchy
> > you
> > > > talk about really existed.
> > > >
> > >
> > > any arguments to support that claim? I rather think we are /because/ of
> > the
> > > anarchy which IMHO is obvious when you look at what's happening around
> > you.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Anarchy is the absence of rules, I instead see a lot of rules so no
> > anarchy at all.
>
>
> No, it's the absence of rulers not rules and because of this flaw in your
> definition the second half of your sentence as well as the remainder of
> your post is moot. Now you probably should reread my OP with that
> information.
>
>
>

How do you enforce rules without rulers, even if the individual
enforces the rules on himself only he gets a kind of ruler.

Ciao,
Tito