On 19/7/23 14:29, capercally.bleery670@??? wrote:
>> Contrarily, systemd-resolved is not really safe to use.
> My turn to be curious. Why not safe?

I used it for a while but started to get timeouts on resolution for some
sites only.

After a lot of research it seems systemd-resolved has bugs related to
secure DNS.

It was easiest to just remove it and use the name resolution provided by
DHCP, or to use a caching only installation of bind9.

Although systemd-resolved is part of systemd, it's not a required part
as some documentation would lead you to believe. Nor is NetworkManager
required either, and that's also well left alone.