On 2023-01-11 20:38:41, karl@??? wrote:
> Rainer Weikusat:
> ...
> > I'd be willing to put
> > work into a more general solutions if this was of interest to other
> > people than me.
>
> Well people are interested in whining but no doing real work it seems
> when I asked.
>
> > For religious reasons, I refuse to use busybox for anything. I spent
> > some years working with and fixing this code for an embedded system at
> > the time when these were still fairly small. The corresponding product
> > (not project) is long dead, hence, I'm rid of the associated
> > problems. Unless I'm forced to, I'll never again touch this code(base).
>
> Ok, I havn't seen thoose problems in my embedded things, but embedded
> now can host regular devuan, and also the busybox situation might have
> improved.

Rob Landley, who used to maintain busybox, is now working on toybox which
is the same sort of thing, but written from scratch. He uses Devuan.

--
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.