:: Re: [DNG] Configuring ethernet port…
トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Curtis Maurand
日付:  
To: dng
古いトピック: Re: [DNG] Configuring ethernet port for IPv6
題目: Re: [DNG] Configuring ethernet port for IPv6


On 1/30/22 14:01, o1bigtenor via Dng wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 8:14 AM Simon <linux@???> wrote:
>> Joel Roth via Dng <dng@???> wrote:
>>
>>> My problem is connecting via dhcp over ethernet. On IRC
>>> I was advised to try
>>>
>>> ping ff02::1%eth1
>>>
>>> which fails to get a response, indicating IPv6 is not enabled in my client.
>>>
>>> I tried setting "iface eth1 inet6 dhcp" in /etc/network/interfaces,
>>> then "ifup eth1". This fails with
>>>
>>> no link-local IPv6 address for eth1
>>>
>>> References suggest that "ifconfig eth1 up" or "ip link set dev eth1 up"
>>> will trigger the kernel to assign an IPv6 address. Since
>>> this is not happening, I'm asking the wisdom of the list VUAs
>>> how to enable IPv6 for this port.
>> You don’t actually need DHCP to configure IPv6.
> snip
>> As an aside, and not specifically in response to either of the above emails, I recommend the certification scheme run by HE at https://ipv6.he.net/certification/, and if your ISP doesn’t yet offer IPv6, then their tunnel service will provide you with good IPv6 connectivity. It’s true that there is some learning you need to do for IPv6, but this course will take you through things in steps - start with the basics and work up to the more complicated stuff. The only bit I thought was a p.i.t.a. is a stage where you have to provide ping and traceroute results to 100 different IPv6 destinations over 100 days. The hardest part if finding 100 different destinations - at the time I did it, I did some grepping of DNS server logs at work to find them ;-)
>>
>>
> Not only do I want to echo mr Joel but for mr Simon.
> This gives great information - - - all together AND in a fashion that
> I think I may even be understanding this.
> Please would you fashion perhaps 2 or three more messages for
> intermediate and maybe even extend this into more of the
> 'advanced' networking country.
>
> I am not needing ipv6 at present but likely this spring fiber optics
> are happening (finally some decent speed options) and they are
> in the process of moving to ipv6 likely within a year or so. I would
> prefer to know at least some more before I 'need' it.

I think this is all great right up until you need a fixed address for
something like a mail server or a web server.  So far, I've found IPV6
to be unreliable.




--

Curtis
https://curtis.maurand.com