:: Re: [DNG] meta: list
トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Alessandro Vesely
日付:  
To: dng
題目: Re: [DNG] meta: list
On Fri 02/Sep/2022 22:09:27 +0200 marc wrote:
>>>But look here: This is the sending host for the DNG mailing list:
>>>
>>> Received: from mail.dyne.org (ns3218761.ip-162-19-139.eu [162.19.139.95])
>>
>>
>> I think OVH allows classless delegation or at least setting PTRs for fixed
>> IPs. I'd guess it's laziness the reason why it isn't set. The list has no
>> DKIM signature, which is another sign of it. However, they have a good SPF
>> record.
>
> Aha - now that you mention it:
>
> $ dig +nocmd +short dyne.org txt
> "google-site-verification=6FghqJroXIvBY8cutq6ouO0RC-a8qynFu6sJR3S-IbA"
> "v=spf1 mx ip4:162.19.139.95/32 ip4:195.169.149.119/32 ip4:213.127.207.66/32 ip4:141.95.83.167/32 ip4:141.95.47.84/32 -all"
> "google-site-verification=xUtkCygX3roBSYAEh01x4JWAYzvUarh3igtFGUu99v8"
> "google-site-verification=Jl4hhjC5wPXP1owryns13qpeuEksWw_m-8lWNL_Kleg"
> "google-site-verification=2XoWrMMTQ7jmgcB_76Y_TQSnWDGhR4e-y_KLqoKOK1Q"
>
> Maybe it is not the spf line that makes a difference here but
> the other gunk. I worry that takes us ever closer to changing the E
> in email to a G.



No, those records seem to be for the web, not for email.


> Maybe related news, and some more reading:
>
> https://www.jwz.org/blog/2022/08/today-in-google-broke-email/



The reason why Google breaks email is not their getting stricter.

That blog surprised me when it says that a company cannot afford disk space to
hold email for its employees!


Best
Ale
--