On Wednesday, 19 January at 10:22, o1bigtenor via Dng wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:37 AM Andrew McGlashan via Dng
><dng@???> wrote:
>>
>> On 20/1/22 1:03 am, Antony Stone wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 19 January 2022 at 15:02:00, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:59:35PM -0600, golinux@??? wrote:
>> >>>> Like this? https://transfer.sh/cTgmNi/if-rev2.png
>> >>>
>> >>> Or this might be even better https://transfer.sh/CeUT0r/if-rev3.png
>> >>
>> >> I do not see a difference between rev 2 and rev 3.
>> >
>> > "take"
>>
>> Yeah, I never noticed the "hidden" text around the circle either.
>>
>
>Watermark type of text is only useful if it is visible enough to be
>seen without needing special equipment imo.

For anyone who missed it, the background is actually transparent. Overlay the
logo on a different background to have the "hidden" text show much more
clearly.

- Antoine


--
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However,
this is not necessarily a good idea.