On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 04:23:56PM +0900, Simon Walter wrote:
> On 5/26/21 12:37 AM, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > This is actually a Debian bug and should be fixed there.
> >
> > If cockpit requires systemd, is should declare that dependency.
>
> AFAICT, it requires a systemd socket. It doesn't require any systemd
> packages (debs). Would that still be considered a dependency WRT to
> packages?

I am no systemd expert ;) and have little first hand knowledge of it. But my
limited understanding is that systemd socket activation is the systemd
absorption/reimplementation of inetd(8) and requires systemd itself to be
running.

Mark