Sun, 7 Mar 2021 19:11:18 +0100 - "dng@???" <dng@???>:

> On 07-03-2021 18:20, tito via Dng wrote:
[...] I personally would scrap:
[..]
> > apparmor
[...]
> > Tito

> Mostly agree with you and in its current state apparmor belongs to this
> list. In the same time I like the idea of apparmor in limiting apps
> behavior. It could be most useful if implemented correctly.
> Nick


Hi

I have:

~~~
$ sudo service apparmor status

apparmor module is loaded.
17 profiles are loaded.
17 profiles are in enforce mode.
/usr/bin/man
/usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session//chromium
/usr/sbin/cups-browsed
/usr/sbin/cupsd
/usr/sbin/cupsd//third_party
/usr/sbin/libvirtd
/usr/sbin/libvirtd//qemu_bridge_helper
/usr/sbin/ntpd
/usr/sbin/tcpdump
man_filter
man_groff
nvidia_modprobe
nvidia_modprobe//kmod
system_tor
virt-aa-helper
0 profiles are in complain mode.
6 processes have profiles defined.
6 processes are in enforce mode.
/usr/sbin/cups-browsed (2446)
/usr/sbin/cupsd (12205)
/usr/lib/cups/notifier/dbus (12208) /usr/sbin/cupsd
/usr/sbin/libvirtd (3278)
/usr/sbin/ntpd (3030)
/usr/bin/tor (3200) system_tor
0 processes are in complain mode.
0 processes are unconfined but have a profile defined.
~~~

I have done nothing (I can remember) about apparmor configuration and
profiles...

Maybe it was installed by default or maybe I had installed it ages ago and
it hasremained over time, a dist-upgrade after the other.

So, I would like your advice: is there any sense that I keep it on the
system? Or can I do without quietly?

Thanks in advance.

Regards
al3xu5

--
Say NO to copyright, patents, trademarks and industrial design
restrictions!
____________________________________________________________________________

Public GPG/PGP key: 8FC2 3121 2803 86E9 F7D8 B624 DA50 835B 2624 A36B