On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:18:56 +1100
wirelessduck--- via Dng <dng@???> wrote:

> > On 31 Oct 2020, at 10:52, Simon Walter <simon@???> wrote:
> >
> > On 10/30/20 3:19 AM, Bernard Rosset via Dng wrote:
> >>> That said, I've stopped using unbound and I'm using straight BIND
> >>> as my local resolver lately. It's pleasant.
> >> From what we discovered about unbound during one of the meetings,
> >> I clearly do not trust that technology.
> >
> > What meetings? Is it possible to divulge some more info WRT what
> > you discovered? I am curious.
>
> Could it be related to this?
>
> https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/issues/303

If that's all it is, it applies only to sysvinit. One can install
runit, supervise runit as a case-by-case supervisor from sysvinit's
/etc/inittab, and start and stop unbound from runit. I was doing this
ten years ago with djbdns. There's no shame in having some of your
daemons started by sysvinit, and others started by daemontools,
daemontools-encore, runit, or s6.

SteveT

Steve Litt
Autumn 2020 featured book: Thriving in Tough Times
http://www.troubleshooters.com/thrive