On 2020-10-28 07:47, Rick Moen wrote:
...
> I continue to like projects that are limited in feature scope enough to
> not live or die by corporate underwriting. E.g., mutt continues to be
> maintainable by a small group of motivated developers. When I want it
> to be graphical, I run it in an xterm. ;->
>

I totally agree. That is one reason I thought TB was a good choice over
other, at the time, popular software such as Eudora and Outlook. It was
a safe bet, but maybe I should start looking into a new "PIM"
infrastructure. I'll keep dovecot and postfix, but I'm not sure about
the rest.