On Sunday 25 October 2020 19:55:28 Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:04:54AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Saturday 24 October 2020 08:19:31 Tom Rini wrote:
> > > Let me add in the TI folks that might be able to look in to any of this
> > > today. But the next problem is that the rx51 needs to be converted to
> > > use DM in U-Boot. It's throwing up a ton of "you need to convert to X
> > > by <some release in 2019> or this board may be removed" warnings at
> > > build. I really really want to see some of this start to be addressed.
> >
> > Well, I do not see any warnings at build, I'm building U-Boot by command:
> >
> > $ make nokia_rx51_defconfig && make SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=0 ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- u-boot.bin
>
> Note that ARCH=arm is meaningless in U-Boot.
>
> > Maybe I'm doing something wrong that I do not see it? Or is there any
> > other way to "list all issues for N900" which needs to be addressed?
>
> Yes, the "all" target.

Ok, now I see them! I used in all my scripts only u-boot.bin target (as
I needed only this one binary), so basically all warnings were perfectly
hidden also in past and I did not know about it...

Maybe there are more people who do not know about these warnings? What
about printing them as part of u-boot.bin target?

> > Anyway, I'm looking at DM and as the first step I will do conversion of
> > code to CONFIG_DM_I2C. It is OK for you? Maybe it brings some light to
> > non-working second i2c bus.
> >
> > I hope that TI (or other) developers look at that mmc issue as this is
> > blocking all N900 users.
>
> Maybe converting to DM_MMC will also clear up or shed more light on the
> problem you have there as well.
>
> --
> Tom