On 24/10/2020 12:06, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Wednesday 21 October 2020 08:47:02 Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:08:37AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 20 October 2020 10:17:07 Tom Rini wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 11:30:51AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: <snip> >>> Yes, there is mmc issue, I have found which commit caused it and
>>> because nobody was able to debug / understand what is happening I have
>>> sent revert patch, which fixes that issue, until somebody solve issue in
>>> original patch.
>>>
>>> But I do not see any progress on either applying revert patch or fixing
>>> original patch.
>>>
>>> And I do not like to have custom patch in my local branch (and
>>> periodically rebasing it) as it just another layer of complication.
>>>
>>> Could we move somehow in this issue?
>>
>> No, it's probably stuck until you can fix the problem or otherwise add a
>> "quirk" for your platform. What does Linux do in this case?
>
> Well, I provided all requested information, just I'm lacking any new
> response from developers / maintainers of particular code.
>
> I have already identified problematic place / commit and I have already
> sent revert patch which fixing this issue.
>
> Tom, what else do you need?
>
> I see the main issue now that nobody reviewed / merged patch and nobody
> responded to emails which I have sent more then 2 months ago.
I would like to add my voice for reverting the patches that break the
support, and work from that point to improve support and eventually
migrate to DT.
Maemo Leste has a lot of Nokia N900 users, and this is blocking us from
moving to mainline u-boot. Is it possible to get the opinion of the
original patch authors on this?
I am set up with a serial module on the Nokia N900, so I can help
provide specific debug info.