On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 12:22:27 -0400
Hendrik Boom <hendrik@???> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 11:04:23AM +0100, g4sra via Dng wrote:
> > I am seeking any Devuaners with an interest in lxc to bounce ideas
> > off.
> >
> > I wish to move to multi-fully-containerised development but am
> > repeatedly stumbling along the way. Unfortunately the official lxc
> > resources do not help much with the (systemd-less) issues I am
> > having. I find bouncing (sometimes stupid - I find playing devils
> > advocate can really help) ideas off other people often helps
> > understanding and can lead to solving the problems.
> >
> > If anybody out there with practical experience or interest in lxc
> > would like to be electronically pestered, please reply direct to me
> > off list.
>
> No practical experience.
> But is there any chance lxc can play nicely with random USB devices?
> Or the built-in camera and microphone?
>
> -- hendrik
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
I think so, you can write hardware device exception rules, though I
have not played with this myself. Only to fix containment and AppArmor
breakage on a server.
--
_________________________________________
/ Suppose for a moment that the \
| automobile industry had developed at |
| the same rate as computers and over the |
| same period: how much cheaper and more |
| efficient would the current models be? |
| If you have not already heard the |
| analogy, the answer is shattering. |
| Today you would be able to buy a |
| Rolls-Royce for $2.75, it would do |
| three million miles to the gallon, and |
| it would deliver enough power to drive |
| the Queen Elizabeth II. And if you were |
| interested in miniaturization, you |
| could place half a dozen of them on a |
| pinhead. |
| |
\ -- Christopher Evans /
-----------------------------------------
\
\
/\ /\
//\\_//\\ ____
\_ _/ / /
/ * * \ /^^^]
\_\O/_/ [ ]
/ \_ [ /
\ \_ / /
[ [ / \/ _/
_[ [ \ /_/