On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 12:11:46AM +0200, Harald Arnesen via Dng wrote:
> Haines Brown [07.08.2020 18:19]:
>
> > Yes, for sure. If you are right about the speed difference between
> > NTFS and ext4, then is there another FS that can be accessed by a
> > Windows machine that is not much slower than ext4?
>
> fat32. Or if you run a recent kernel on your Linux machine (Devuan 5.4
> is ok), then exfat.
> --
> Hilsen Harald

Hilsen, going to fat32 might be my bset bet if its speed is more like
ext4 than ntfs. Is it the consensus that this is the case?

--
Haines Brown