I just sysd2v v0.3 the /lib/systemd/system/iwd.service and the start
look good. Process is in ps auxf |grep "iwd"
I’m currently not able to be sure furthermore if it’s really working i
have to read more about init script (never know what is needed or/and
for what) iw and connman integration there is a systemd script for
that to
cat /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/net.connman.iwd.service
[D-BUS Service]
Name=net.connman.iwd
Exec=/bin/false
User=root
SystemdService=iwd.service
but not sure it s a really usefull one
Le ven. 7 août 2020 à 12:14, Bardot Jérôme <bardot.jerome@???> a écrit :
>
> If it’s really the case it’s not fair and not profesionnal at all.
>
> For me the fact is the current situation is not suitable at all. debian
> and devuan need a way to select init system and apt install related
> packages even if the default package is systemd. Something like that.
>
> mypackage
> mypackage-sysinit
>
>
> For the current problem i guess if we do the init file maybe we can
> upstream push request it instead of forking it ?
>
> Also i don t know state of devuan's $$ ressources but it will be
> necessary to have some kind of testing of all package (pseudo code)
>
> service package start
> if $? == 0
> ok
> else
> notok
>
> And also scenario cases to improve qualities because it’s the only way
> to keep diversity on long term. (a day i will have time to weekly meeting)
>
>
>
> On 07/08/2020 04:12, Job Bautista wrote:
> > It's not declared in Depends, but iwd has a hidden dependency on systemd. On
> > non-systemd systems, iwd doesn't autostart on boot, requiring you to start it
> > manually or create an initscript for it. Debian packages are supposed to work
> > out-of-the-box when you install them. If today's iwd was being packaged
> > before systemd became the default init of Debian, no sane DD would have
> > sponsored or accepted it into the main archive.
> >
> > iwd also has a Build-Depends on systemd, which means it's impossible to build
> > iwd on Devuan without disabling the compilation of the systemd service on
> > debian/rules. Or maybe it does build without systemd even when the systemd
> > service compilation is enabled. I haven't tested that yet I think.
> >
> > Job Bautista
> >
> > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > On Thursday, August 6, 2020 11:28 PM, Bardot Jérôme <bardot.jerome@???> wrote:
> >
> >> I just check in testing debian and
> >>
> >
> >> #apt show iwd
> >>
> >
> >> Package: iwd
> >> Version: 1.8-1
> >> Priority: optional
> >> Section: net
> >> Maintainer: Andreas Henriksson andreas@???
> >> Installed-Size: 2 019 kB
> >> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.27), libreadline8 (>= 6.0)
> >> Download-Size: 483 kB
> >> APT-Manual-Installed: yes
> >> APT-Sources: tor+http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 Packages
> >> Description: wireless daemon for Linux
> >> Minimalistic wireless daemon that uses modern Linux interfaces like
> >> cfg80211 and nl80211 (netlink). The daemon provides a D-Bus API.
> >> .
> >> The daemon can be controlled from the command line with the included
> >> iwctl client utility.
> >> .
> >> The included iwmon utility can be used to monitor the 802.11 subsystem
> >> generic netlink commands and events. It uses the nlmon kernel driver
> >> from Linux 3.10 and later.
> >>
> >
> >> If it s the right package it’s look like their is no dependencies to
> >> systemd.
> >>
> >
> >> On 06/08/2020 06:54, Job Bautista wrote:
> >>
> >
> >>> Hi Jérôme, that looks like a good alternative indeed. It should be packaged by
> >>> Debian though, not Devuan. However, I don't think I can maintain more than two
> >>> packages. I already have a a sponsorship request pending on
> >>> mentors.debian.net for the xfce4-alsa-plugin package.1 And now I'm going to
> >>> maintain a fork of iwd. So you will have to ask someone else to package eiwd.
> >>> I will ask the eiwd dev to consider adding support for sysvinit though. They
> >>> might be more open to supporting multiple inits than their upstream iwd. Or
> >>> they might just reject it because they want to modify as little as possible
> >>> from upstream. Who knows...
> >>> Job Bautista
> >>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> >>> On Wednesday, August 5, 2020 9:58 PM, Jérôme Bardot bardot.jerome@??? wrote:
> >>>
> >
> >>>> i also will ask for it, also maybe try to use
> >>>> https://github.com/dylanaraps/eiwd look like a good alternative
> >>>> because of the no dbus functionalities ?
> >>>
> >
> >>>> Le mer. 5 août 2020 à 14:31, Mark Hindley mark@??? a écrit :
> >>>
> >
> >>>>> Job,
> >>>>> Many thanks for taking this on.
> >>>>> A few comments on https://git.devuan.org/jobbautista9/iwd
> >>>
> >
> >>>>> - The branch should be suites/unstable.
> >>>>> - Add Origin: Devuan to d/control
> >>>>> - You need to update d/gbp.conf, in particular debian-branch, debian-tag and
> >>>>> pristine-tar. Devuan avoids using pristine-tar.
> >>>>>
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>>>> - Vcs-* fields in d/control should be https://git.devuan.org/devuan/iwd (where
> >>>>> the definitive source will be once it is accepted)
> >>>>>
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>>>> - You don't need quilt patches for changes in debian/. So you can just create
> >>>>> the initscript as debian/iwd.init.
> >>>>>
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>>>> - You shouldn't add the initscript control fragments to the maintscripts
> >>>>> manually, debhelper should do it (correctly) for you.
> >>>>>
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>>>>
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>>>> Other than the last item, these are documented in the Devuan Maintainers
> >>>>> Guide1. If anything is not clear do ping me on #devuan-dev.
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>> Mark (LeePen)
> >>>>> 1 https://git.devuan.org/devuan/documentation/src/branch/master/maintainers
> >>>
> >
> >>>>> devuan-dev internal mailing list
> >>>>> devuan-dev@???
> >>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devuan-dev
> >
>
::
[devuan-dev] bug#503: bug#503: Let…
