:: [devuan-dev] bug#503: bug#503: Let…
Startseite
Nachricht löschen
Nachricht beantworten
Autor: Bardot Jérôme
Datum:  
To: Job Bautista
CC: 503@bugs.devuan.org, Mark Hindley
Betreff: [devuan-dev] bug#503: bug#503: Let's fork iwd for Devuan
If it’s really the case it’s not fair and not profesionnal at all.

For me the fact is the current situation is not suitable at all. debian
and devuan need a way to select init system and apt install related
packages even if the default package is systemd. Something like that.

mypackage
mypackage-sysinit


For the current problem i guess if we do the init file maybe we can
upstream push request it instead of forking it ?

Also i don t know state of devuan's $$ ressources but it will be
necessary to have some kind of testing of all package (pseudo code)

service package start
if $? == 0
ok
else
notok

And also scenario cases to improve qualities because it’s the only way
to keep diversity on long term. (a day i will have time to weekly meeting)



On 07/08/2020 04:12, Job Bautista wrote:
> It's not declared in Depends, but iwd has a hidden dependency on systemd. On
> non-systemd systems, iwd doesn't autostart on boot, requiring you to start it
> manually or create an initscript for it. Debian packages are supposed to work
> out-of-the-box when you install them. If today's iwd was being packaged
> before systemd became the default init of Debian, no sane DD would have
> sponsored or accepted it into the main archive.
>
> iwd also has a Build-Depends on systemd, which means it's impossible to build
> iwd on Devuan without disabling the compilation of the systemd service on
> debian/rules. Or maybe it does build without systemd even when the systemd
> service compilation is enabled. I haven't tested that yet I think.
>
> Job Bautista
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Thursday, August 6, 2020 11:28 PM, Bardot Jérôme <bardot.jerome@???> wrote:
>
>> I just check in testing debian and
>>
>
>> #apt show iwd
>>
>
>> Package: iwd
>> Version: 1.8-1
>> Priority: optional
>> Section: net
>> Maintainer: Andreas Henriksson andreas@???
>> Installed-Size: 2 019 kB
>> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.27), libreadline8 (>= 6.0)
>> Download-Size: 483 kB
>> APT-Manual-Installed: yes
>> APT-Sources: tor+http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 Packages
>> Description: wireless daemon for Linux
>> Minimalistic wireless daemon that uses modern Linux interfaces like
>> cfg80211 and nl80211 (netlink). The daemon provides a D-Bus API.
>> .
>> The daemon can be controlled from the command line with the included
>> iwctl client utility.
>> .
>> The included iwmon utility can be used to monitor the 802.11 subsystem
>> generic netlink commands and events. It uses the nlmon kernel driver
>> from Linux 3.10 and later.
>>
>
>> If it s the right package it’s look like their is no dependencies to
>> systemd.
>>
>
>> On 06/08/2020 06:54, Job Bautista wrote:
>>
>
>>> Hi Jérôme, that looks like a good alternative indeed. It should be packaged by
>>> Debian though, not Devuan. However, I don't think I can maintain more than two
>>> packages. I already have a a sponsorship request pending on
>>> mentors.debian.net for the xfce4-alsa-plugin package.1 And now I'm going to
>>> maintain a fork of iwd. So you will have to ask someone else to package eiwd.
>>> I will ask the eiwd dev to consider adding support for sysvinit though. They
>>> might be more open to supporting multiple inits than their upstream iwd. Or
>>> they might just reject it because they want to modify as little as possible
>>> from upstream. Who knows...
>>> Job Bautista
>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>> On Wednesday, August 5, 2020 9:58 PM, Jérôme Bardot bardot.jerome@??? wrote:
>>>
>
>>>> i also will ask for it, also maybe try to use
>>>> https://github.com/dylanaraps/eiwd look like a good alternative
>>>> because of the no dbus functionalities ?
>>>
>
>>>> Le mer. 5 août 2020 à 14:31, Mark Hindley mark@??? a écrit :
>>>
>
>>>>> Job,
>>>>> Many thanks for taking this on.
>>>>> A few comments on https://git.devuan.org/jobbautista9/iwd
>>>
>
>>>>> -   The branch should be suites/unstable.
>>>>> -   Add Origin: Devuan to d/control
>>>>> -   You need to update d/gbp.conf, in particular debian-branch, debian-tag and
>>>>>     pristine-tar. Devuan avoids using pristine-tar.

>>>>>
>
>>>
>
>>>>> -   Vcs-* fields in d/control should be https://git.devuan.org/devuan/iwd (where
>>>>>     the definitive source will be once it is accepted)

>>>>>
>
>>>
>
>>>>> -   You don't need quilt patches for changes in debian/. So you can just create
>>>>>     the initscript as debian/iwd.init.

>>>>>
>
>>>
>
>>>>> -   You shouldn't add the initscript control fragments to the maintscripts
>>>>>     manually, debhelper should do it (correctly) for you.

>>>>>
>
>>>
>
>>>>>
>
>>>
>
>>>>> Other than the last item, these are documented in the Devuan Maintainers
>>>>> Guide1. If anything is not clear do ping me on #devuan-dev.
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Mark (LeePen)
>>>>> 1 https://git.devuan.org/devuan/documentation/src/branch/master/maintainers
>>>
>
>>>>> devuan-dev internal mailing list
>>>>> devuan-dev@???
>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devuan-dev
>