Your message dated Fri, 22 May 2020 10:06:43 +0100
with message-id <20200522090643.GD32762@???>
and subject line Re: devuan-project: runit-init should be included in Init
has caused the Devuan bug report #448,
regarding devuan-project: runit-init should be included in "Init Freedom" page.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@???
immediately.)
--
448:
https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=448
Devuan Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@??? with problems
Package: devuan-project
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
In the init freedom page for Devuan Beowulf,
https://beta.devuan.org/os/init-freedom/
runit is listed but it is not said that runit is also available
in Devuan Beowulf. It should be included (unless you are going
to remove runit-init from Beowulf).
On the other hand, the meanings of the word "init" are very different between
the "Init Freedom" page
https://beta.devuan.org/os/init-freedom/
and the Devuan Installer Beta 2
https://beta.devuan.org/os/documentation/install-guides/beowulf/img/025initchoice.png
The former means /sbin/init while the latter means NOT /sbin/init but "rc".
The word "init" must be consistent in all parts of the Devuan project,
in my opinion (do you agree?).
See also another bug report
https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=446
Best regards, Ryutaroh Matsumoto
-- System Information:
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Devuan GNU/Linux 3 (beowulf)
Release: 3
Codename: beowulf
Architecture: x86_64
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-8-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
On Sat, 09 May 2020 11:31:14 +0900 (JST) Ryutaroh Matsumoto <ryutaroh@???> wrote:
> Package: devuan-project
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> In the init freedom page for Devuan Beowulf,
> https://beta.devuan.org/os/init-freedom/
Updated.
Thanks.
Mark
::
[devuan-dev] bug#448: marked as don…
&References=handler.448.D448.159013860117948.ackdone@bugs.devuan.org&In-Reply-To=handler.448.D448.159013860117948.ackdone@bugs.devuan.org&Body=Le%202020-05-22%2009:17,%20Devuan%20bug%20Tracking%20System%20a%20%C3%A9crit%C2%A0:%0A>%20Your%20message%20dated%20Fri,%2022%20May%202020%2010:06:43%20+0100%0A>%20with%20message-id%20<20200522090643.GD32762@???>%0A>%20and%20subject%20line%20Re:%20devuan-project:%20runit-init%20should%20be%20included%20in%20Init%0A>%20has%20caused%20the%20Devuan%20bug%20report%20#448,%0A>%20regarding%20devuan-project:%20runit-init%20should%20be%20included%20in%20%22Init%20Freedom%22%20page.%0A>%20to%20be%20marked%20as%20done.%0A>%20%0A>%20This%20means%20that%20you%20claim%20that%20the%20problem%20has%20been%20dealt%20with.%0A>%20If%20this%20is%20not%20the%20case%20it%20is%20now%20your%20responsibility%20to%20reopen%20the%0A>%20bug%20report%20if%20necessary,%20and/or%20fix%20the%20problem%20forthwith.%0A>%20%0A>%20(NB:%20If%20you%20are%20a%20system%20administrator%20and%20have%20no%20idea%20what%20this%0A>%20message%20is%20talking%20about,%20this%20may%20indicate%20a%20serious%20mail%20system%0A>%20misconfiguration%20somewhere.%20Please%20contact%20owner@???%0A>%20immediately.)%0A>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20--%20%0A>%20448:%20https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=448%0A>%20Devuan%20Bug%20Tracking%20System%0A>%20Contact%20owner@???%20with%20problems%0A>%20Package:%20devuan-project%0A>%20Severity:%20normal%0A>%20%0A>%20Dear%20Maintainer,%0A>%20%0A>%20In%20the%20init%20freedom%20page%20for%20Devuan%20Beowulf,%0A>%20https://beta.devuan.org/os/init-freedom/%0A>%20runit%20is%20listed%20but%20it%20is%20not%20said%20that%20runit%20is%20also%20available%0A>%20in%20Devuan%20Beowulf.%20It%20should%20be%20included%20(unless%20you%20are%20going%0A>%20to%20remove%20runit-init%20from%20Beowulf).%0A>%20%0A>%20On%20the%20other%20hand,%20the%20meanings%20of%20the%20word%20%22init%22%20are%20very%20different%20between%0A>%20the%20%22Init%20Freedom%22%20page%0A>%20https://beta.devuan.org/os/init-freedom/%0A>%20and%20the%20Devuan%20Installer%20Beta%202%0A>%20https://beta.devuan.org/os/documentation/install-guides/beowulf/img/025initchoice.png%0A>%20%0A>%20The%20former%20means%20/sbin/init%20while%20the%20latter%20means%20NOT%20/sbin/init%20but%20%22rc%22.%0A>%20The%20word%20%22init%22%20must%20be%20consistent%20in%20all%20parts%20of%20the%20Devuan%20project,%0A>%20in%20my%20opinion%20(do%20you%20agree?).%0A>%20See%20also%20another%20bug%20report%20https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=446%0A>%20%0A>%20Best%20regards,%20Ryutaroh%20Matsumoto%0A>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20Kernel:%20Linux%204.19.0-8-amd64%20(SMP%20w/4%20CPU%20cores)%0A>%20Locale:%20LANG=en_US.UTF-8,%20LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8%20(charmap=UTF-8),%20LANGUAGE=en_US:en%20(charmap=UTF-8)%0A>%20Shell:%20/bin/sh%20linked%20to%20/bin/dash%0A>%20Init:%20sysvinit%20(via%20/sbin/init)%0A>%20LSM:%20AppArmor:%20enabled%0A>%20On%20Sat,%2009%20May%202020%2011:31:14%20+0900%20(JST)%20Ryutaroh%20Matsumoto%20<ryutaroh@???>%20wrote:%0A>%20>%20Package:%20devuan-project%0A>%20>%20Severity:%20normal%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20>%20Dear%20Maintainer,%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20>%20In%20the%20init%20freedom%20page%20for%20Devuan%20Beowulf,%0A>%20>%20https://beta.devuan.org/os/init-freedom/%0A>%20%0A>%20Updated.%0A>%20%0A>%20Thanks.%0A>%20%0A>%20Mark "Répondre à ce message")
