:: [devuan-dev] bug#458: marked as don…
Forside
Slet denne besked
Besvar denne besked
Skribent: Devuan bug Tracking System
Dato:  
Til: Mark Hindley
Emne: [devuan-dev] bug#458: marked as done (package accountsservice (Beowulf) only ships a systemd service unit)
Your message dated Fri, 15 May 2020 18:23:04 +0100
with message-id <20200515172304.GF32762@???>
and subject line Re: bug#458: package accountsservice (Beowulf) only ships a systemd service unit
has caused the Devuan bug report #458,
regarding package accountsservice (Beowulf) only ships a systemd service unit
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@???
immediately.)


--
458: https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=458
Devuan Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@??? with problems
Package: accountsservice
Version: 0.6.45-2

The accountsservice package is evidently used by various greeters to supply
per-user information like, for instance, per-user background images. It
appears to only install system units, not a proper init script.

-- 
Mason Loring Bliss   ((  "In the drowsy dark cave of the mind dreams
mason@???     ))  build  their nest  with fragments  dropped
http://blisses.org/  ((   from day's caravan." - Rabindranath Tagore

Mason

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 05:58:33PM -0400, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
> Package: accountsservice
> Version: 0.6.45-2
>
> The accountsservice package is evidently used by various greeters to supply
> per-user information like, for instance, per-user background images. It
> appears to only install system units, not a proper init script.


Thanks for this. However, as discussed on #devuan-dev, the accountsservice
daemon is started by DBus activation. That seems to be working fine in my
testing, so I don't think the package requires an initscript.

Do feel free to reopen if you think I have missed something and this requires
reconsideration.

Thanks.

Mark