* Pavel Machek <pavel@???> [200514 18:27]:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > They are now significantly different.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you want something working, take one of the branches I mentioned before.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you want to look at the code, take a look at the latest
> > > > > branch... and that one is also suitable base for development.
> > > >
> > > > Pavel care to try to boil the motchat and motorolamodem stuff
> > > > into minimal changes now that you have it working? Then I'll
> > > > try to flip over to using it :)
> > >
> > > I pushed m-1.31-5, it has some minor cleanups.
> > >
> > > Hmm. voicecall.c looks pretty ok/clean, but majority are various
> > > obscure GSM features I never use... someone should test that.
> >
> > Heh voicecall.c already looks very close to what I have in my
> > motmdm-serdev-ngsm branch :) Except I got rid of passing the
> > U0000 to the commands. If we standardize on motorola_template()
> > not needing U0000 and g_mot_chat_send() needing it, then I can
> > just rename my mot_at_chat_send() to g_mot_chat_send() and we
> > should get voicecall.c mostly synced up already. Well there
> > should not be need to pass U0000 in the g_mot_chat_register()
> > either and then I can just add a temporary wrapper for
> > g_mot_chat_register() for now.
>
> Yes, I guess that can be done :-). But question is -- does most of
> that code work on D4? I have not tested all the multiparty calling
> stuff...

No idea if it works or not.. I suggest just leaving all that out
for now and add it back later once feature at a time after being
tested.

Regards,

Tony