Hi!

> > > > They are now significantly different.
> > > >
> > > > If you want something working, take one of the branches I mentioned before.
> > > >
> > > > If you want to look at the code, take a look at the latest
> > > > branch... and that one is also suitable base for development.
> > >
> > > Pavel care to try to boil the motchat and motorolamodem stuff
> > > into minimal changes now that you have it working? Then I'll
> > > try to flip over to using it :)
> >
> > I pushed m-1.31-5, it has some minor cleanups.
> >
> > Hmm. voicecall.c looks pretty ok/clean, but majority are various
> > obscure GSM features I never use... someone should test that.
>
> Heh voicecall.c already looks very close to what I have in my
> motmdm-serdev-ngsm branch :) Except I got rid of passing the
> U0000 to the commands. If we standardize on motorola_template()
> not needing U0000 and g_mot_chat_send() needing it, then I can
> just rename my mot_at_chat_send() to g_mot_chat_send() and we
> should get voicecall.c mostly synced up already. Well there
> should not be need to pass U0000 in the g_mot_chat_register()
> either and then I can just add a temporary wrapper for
> g_mot_chat_register() for now.

Yes, I guess that can be done :-). But question is -- does most of
that code work on D4? I have not tested all the multiparty calling
stuff...

Best regards,
                                    Pavel

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html