Hi Mark


Sun, 22 Mar 2020 18:28:21 +0000 - Mark Hindley <mark@???>:

> > 1- There is one aspect of the upgrade that I don't think is in place, and
> > that I would like to point out: elogind, libelogind0, libpam-elogind have
> > not been upgraded; indeed these packages are marked as 'upgradable'. How
> > should I manage this situation?
>
> To help us work out why, what does `apt policy libsystemd0 libelogind0 elogind
> libpam-elogind' produce?

See below (calf-plugins also was not upgraded):

~~~
$ apt policy libsystemd0 libelogind0 elogind calf-plugins
libsystemd0:
  Installato: 241-7~deb10u3
  Candidato:  241-7~deb10u3
  Tabella versione:
     244.3-1~bpo10+1 100
        100 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf-backports/main amd64 Packages
 *** 241-7~deb10u3 500
        500 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
libelogind0:
  Installato: 234.4-2
  Candidato:  241.4-2
  Tabella versione:
     241.4-2 500
        500 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 Packages
 *** 234.4-2 100
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
elogind:
  Installato: 234.4-2
  Candidato:  241.4-2
  Tabella versione:
     241.4-2 500
        500 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 Packages
 *** 234.4-2 100
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
calf-plugins:
  Installato: 0.0.60-4+b1
  Candidato:  0.90.1-2
  Tabella versione:
     0.90.1-2 500
        500 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 Packages
 *** 0.0.60-4+b1 100
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
~~~

> Does `apt install libpam-elogind' fix it?

Hum... that's what I have:

~~~
$ sudo apt-get install libpam-elogind
Lettura elenco dei pacchetti... Fatto
Generazione albero delle dipendenze       
Lettura informazioni sullo stato... Fatto
I seguenti pacchetti aggiuntivi saranno inoltre installati:
  elogind libelogind0
I seguenti pacchetti saranno RIMOSSI:
  libsystemd0
I seguenti pacchetti saranno aggiornati:
  elogind libelogind0 libpam-elogind
3 aggiornati, 0 installati, 1 da rimuovere e 1 non aggiornati.
~~~

It sounds good... Should I apply?


> > 3. Programs with a graphic display started complaining about the warning
> > "Couldn't register with accessibility bus: ..." [3][4]. Putting 'export
> > NO_AT_BRIDGE=1' in /etc/environment seems to have blocked the alerts. I
> > don't know if it's a real solution or just a workaround that doesn't solve
> > the underlying problem.
>
> They are harmless. But installing at-spi2-core ought to make them disappear.

at-spi2-core was already installed...


Thanks


--
al3xu5

Say NO to copyright, patents, trademarks and any industrial design restrictions.
________________________________________________________________________________
Public GPG/PGP key
ID:           4096 bit RSA key F94CFE23
Fingerprint:  59C6 9DC7 CD4B CF2F A190  E3DE 69C5 977B F94C FE23