:: Re: [DNG] Which DE?
トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Florian Zieboll
日付:  
To: viverna
CC: dng
題目: Re: [DNG] Which DE?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:04:10 +0100
viverna <viverna@???> wrote:

> il devuanizzato al3xu5 / dotcommon <dotcommon@???> il
> 25-02-20 16:29:58 ha scritto:
>
> > I am using Devuan (2.1) + MATE DE since 08/2016...
> > Now I wish to change DE but I am in doubt: XFCE or LXDE or LXQt???
>
> LXDE is ancestor of LXQt. However is a wonderful DE mostly with
> openbox combination. Openbox is great even alone.


For many years I had been loyal to LXDE, doing customized installations
based on lxde-core on top of a minimal base install. It was the most
lightweight DE known to me (and I don't like XFCE's "comic sans"
feeling, nor thunar). So it was clear that I'd try LXQt quite soon -
not only as LXDE's successor, but also as an expression of my pleasure
in the merging of two interesting projects (LXDE and Razor-qt) in times
of "forks everywhere".

As Viverna, I chose to stay with openbox, which had been the LXDE (as
well as ascii LXqt) default - with beowulf, LXqt has changed its default
to xfwm4.

libre Grüße,
Florian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=8wy8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----