著者: Florian Zieboll 日付: To: viverna CC: dng 題目: Re: [DNG] Which DE?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:04:10 +0100
viverna <viverna@???> wrote:
> il devuanizzato al3xu5 / dotcommon <dotcommon@???> il
> 25-02-20 16:29:58 ha scritto:
>
> > I am using Devuan (2.1) + MATE DE since 08/2016...
> > Now I wish to change DE but I am in doubt: XFCE or LXDE or LXQt???
>
> LXDE is ancestor of LXQt. However is a wonderful DE mostly with
> openbox combination. Openbox is great even alone.
For many years I had been loyal to LXDE, doing customized installations
based on lxde-core on top of a minimal base install. It was the most
lightweight DE known to me (and I don't like XFCE's "comic sans"
feeling, nor thunar). So it was clear that I'd try LXQt quite soon -
not only as LXDE's successor, but also as an expression of my pleasure
in the merging of two interesting projects (LXDE and Razor-qt) in times
of "forks everywhere".
As Viverna, I chose to stay with openbox, which had been the LXDE (as
well as ascii LXqt) default - with beowulf, LXqt has changed its default
to xfwm4.