:: Re: [DNG] Which DE?
Página superior
Eliminar este mensaje
Responder a este mensaje
Autor: Dr. Nikolaus Klepp
Fecha:  
A: dng
Asunto: Re: [DNG] Which DE?
Anno domini 2020 Wed, 26 Feb 20:15:59 +0100
viverna scripsit:
> il devuanizzato Dimitris via Dng <dng@???> il 26-02-20 14:07:14 ha scritto:
> >On 2/25/20 10:07 PM, viverna wrote:
> >> LXDE is ancestor of LXQt. However is a wonderful DE mostly with openbox
> >> combination. Openbox is great even alone.
> >
> >MATE with Openbox is a lighter possibility too..
> Yes, MATE is a good DE (fork of Gnome 2 before Gnome 3 madness). Time
> ago Gnome 2 has been my first choice DE...
>
> >kinda of think of those as systemd-like DEs, bloated to the bone.).
> Kde3 and Gnome2 are best version of the corresponding DE. Gnome3 are
> very very insane and "phone-centric". Kde4 is too big.
>
> However some KDE apps are very good. I use it often.
>
> >LXDE is not abandoned, but it's missing stuff that you have to get from
> >other DEs (=download extra libs, packages..), same as LXQT which is
> >very interesting..
> LXDE is perfect for me. This is my opinion.
>
> >Trinity was very buggy last 2 times i tried it, completely unusable for
> >me.. (even though my first ever DE was kde3 and i wanted it to work
> >for old times sake... :D )
> I don't try Trinity, there is in Devuan repo?
>


add these, they work for beowulf, too:

deb http://mirror.ppa.trinitydesktop.org/trinity-sb buster deps-r14 extra-r14 main-r14
deb-src http://mirror.ppa.trinitydesktop.org/trinity-sb buster deps-r14 extra-r14 main-r14

Then install trinity-keyring and then tde-trinity.

Nik



--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA, CIA ...