著者: terryc 日付: To: dng 題目: Re: [DNG] Result of the Debian vote 'General Resolution: Init
systems and systemd'
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 23:11:16 +1100
Andrew McGlashan via Dng <dng@???> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> On 28/12/19 9:03 pm, Alexis PM via Dng wrote:
> > A mediocre result, neither good nor bad. The best option for people
> > who don't want to use systemd, Option 6 "E: Support for multiple
> > init systems is Required", came in last. But Option 1 "F: Focus on
> > systemd" came in second place, if it had won it would have been a
> > tragedy.
>
> It's completely broken when only one group of interested parties have
> the only say; DDs should be ashamed. Another wasted opportunity to
> make things right has been blown and there probably won't be any other
> opportunity afforded ever again :(
>
> Debian needs to somehow find a way to include users (especially
> sysadmins) in a meaningful way in votes of such significance.
In my experience, when people who do not do the work start telling the
people who do do the work, what to do, many efforts disintigrate.
As a user, I simply choose which best distribution serves my purpose
and when it ceases to do so, I simply move on as I have in the past.
We(6 systems) moved from Debian to Devuan to escape the creeping
systemd infection. We also dumped acting as a torrent source for any
Debian or systemd distro and took up torrenting devuan.
I'm very sure that some systemd free distro will continue and there is
also BSD if we tire of rolling our own kernels as we did in the past.