On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:48:13 +0100, Stephane wrote in message
<22221179-8fb9-d4ad-4d34-70ad26abfed2@???>:

> > .nope, dunno those .eml files, only tried this with digests, and you
> > wanna do one at the time even in scripts to avoid messing up your
> > email archive with malformed messages lurking in your digests.
>
> DIGEST="Dng Digest, Vol 62, Issue 31.eml" ; cat "$DIGEST" |formail -ds
> or
> DIGEST="Dng Digest, Vol 62, Issue 31.eml" ; cat "$DIGEST" |formail +1
> -ds
>
> don't work.

..formail needs a proper procmail setup to work properly.

>
> > ..and still quite often the appropriate way to deal with it. ;o)
>
> This is a part of free computing spirit nowadays that annoys me.
>
> > ..you manage your own box? Install procmail there,
>
> What do you call "box"? I'm at work in my university, using its
> infrastructure.

..excellent, talk to your support staff, they are paid handsomely
precisely to help/support you.

--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.