On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 03:17:58 +1100, Andrew wrote in message
<c5fc27fa-d0a4-c3e8-f1e4-684b08c6a623@???>:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Jo.
>
> On 23/11/19 12:26 am, Ismael L. Donis Garcia wrote:
> > In the worst case we would not be able to rely on MX Linux?
>
> I think not.
>
> MX is not exactly against systemd, they use it still, but not as the
> init system. And MX is reliant upon Debian anyway.... so sad that
> Debian is being destroyed by systemd. I don't know what the answer
> is, but it would have been best if the original TC chose against
> systemd, but that ship has sailed and the damage is well and truly
> done and it's only getting worse.
>
> I prefer Devuan over MX, but at this time I am using MX on a machine
> as an interim until my machine is properly supported by Devuan (if
> that ever happens properly).

..what's missing?

--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.