Hello,
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 14:32:55 +0100
s@po <tuxd3v@???> wrote:
> Hello fsmithred,
>
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 07:51:21 -0400
> fsmithred via Dng <dng@???> wrote:
>
> > On 10/26/19 1:49 AM, Pontus Goffe via Dng wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 2019-10-26 02:27, s@po wrote:
> > >> You see here the '2.0' String, and it comes from the funtion
> > >> guess_release_from_apt().. like you can see above..
> > >> The guess_release_from_apt() function:
> > >> 228 def guess_release_from_apt(origin='Devuan', component='main',
> > >> 229 ignoresuites=('experimental'),
> > >> 230 label='Devuan',
> > >> 231 alternate_olabels={'Devuan
> > >> Ports':'packages.devuan.org'}):
> > >> 232 releases = parse_apt_policy()
> > >> 233
> > >> 234 if not releases:
> > >> 235 return None
> > >> 236
> > >> 237 # We only care about the specified origin, component, and
> > >> label
> > >> 238 releases = [x for x in releases if (
> > >> 239 x[1].get('origin', '') == origin and
> > >> 240 x[1].get('component', '') == component and
> > >> 241 x[1].get('label', '') == label) or (
> > >> 242 x[1].get('origin', '') in alternate_olabels and
> > >> 243 x[1].get('label', '') ==
> > >> alternate_olabels.get(x[1].get('origin', '')))]
> > >> 244
> > >> 245 # Check again to make sure we didn't wipe out all of the
> > >> releases
> > >> 246 if not releases:
> > >> 247 return None
> > >> 248
> > >> 249 releases.sort(key=lambda tuple: tuple[0],reverse=True)
> > >> 250
> > >> 251 # We've sorted the list by descending priority, so the
> > >> first entry should
> > >> 252 # be the "main" release in use on the system
> > >> 253
> > >> 254 max_priority = releases[0][0]
> > >> 255 releases = [x for x in releases if x[0] == max_priority]
> > >> 256 releases.sort(key=release_index)
> > >> 257
> > >> 258 return releases[0][1]
> > >>
> > >> I am afraid that this info, you already know..
> > >> I am not a python guy( I love the Lua simplicity way :) ), I can't
> > >> help.. :(
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> tux
> > >
> > > Who is a python guy?
> > >
> > > parse_apt_policy executes 'apt-cache policy' and parses
> > > (parse_policy_line) the output for lines beginning with release matching
> > > o=Devuan and c=main
> > >
> > > longnames = {'v' : 'version', 'o': 'origin', 'a': 'suite', 'c' :
> > > 'component', 'l': 'label'}
> > >
> > > In my case that is
> > >
> > > 500 http://se.deb.devuan.org/merged ascii/main amd64 Packages
> > > release v=2.0,o=Devuan,a=stable,n=ascii,l=Devuan,c=main,b=amd64
> > > origin se.deb.devuan.org
> > > //PG
> > >
> >
> >
> > Where does 'apt-cache policy' get the version number? Oh, maybe it reads
> > it from the repo. I see that we have:
> >
> > pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged/dists/1.0
> > pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged/dists/2.0
> > pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged/dists/3.0
> >
> > and debian has:
> >
> > debian/dists/Debian8.11
> > debian/dists/Debian9.11
> > debian/dists/Debian10.1
> >
> > Maybe those directory names are supposed to be changed when there's a
> > point release.
> >
>
> It could be..
> Another place, I searched for and makes sense to me:
> http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged/dists/ascii/Release
>
After some digging I believe it comes from:
root@desktop0:~# apt-cache policy lsb-release
lsb-release:
Installed: 4.1+devuan2
Candidate: 4.1+devuan2
Version table:
*** 4.1+devuan2 500
500 http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
root@desktop0:~# apt-cache policy
Package files:
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
release a=now
100 http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii-backports/main amd64 Packages
release v=2.0.0,o=Devuan Backports,a=stable-backports,n=ascii-backports,l=Devuan Backports,c=main,b=amd64
origin pkgmaster.devuan.org
500 http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii/main amd64 Packages
release v=2.0,o=Devuan,a=stable,n=ascii,l=Devuan,c=main,b=amd64
origin pkgmaster.devuan.org
So I think it comes from :
root@desktop0:~# wget -qO-
http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged/dists/{ascii,ascii-backports,ascii-security,ascii-updates}/Release|grep Version --color
Version: 2.0
Version: 2.0.0
Version: 2.0
Version: 2.0.0
Best Regards,
--
tux <tuxd3v@???>