On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:14:44 -0400, Steve wrote in message
<20190927151444.0974f9b3@???>:

> On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:41:01 -0500
> golinux@??? wrote:
>
>
> > Sigh . . . If only Devuan development could generate the
> > participation and enthusiasm that the silliness of systemd bashing
> > does . . .
> >
> > golinux
>
> Nothing silly about it. Devuan was born from systemd bashing. And
> poettering's latest idea is another complexified interaction burr that
> will, if accepted in the general Linux world, increase the level of
> incompatibility between Devuan and the rest of the world. Which means
> Devuan needs even more developers to work around those additional
> incompatibilities.
>
> On the other hand, if poettering fails, Devuan's mindshare goes way
> up, because the VUAs were the first and pretty much only to put their
> code where their mouths were.
>
> What I *do* suggest is that we aim more of our systemd-bashing at the
> proper people at IBM, so that maybe we can have a good result. Which
> is why I asked for which people at IBM should be written to.

..the investors. They wanna know why they should hedge their
bet on IBM and systemd etc investments, and how. ;o)

--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.