On 2019-09-19 11:08, alecmaillist@??? wrote:
> Wouldn't that require even bigger changes to how inits are currently
> packaged? Also, why use a config to determine init? The only benefit I
> see is allowing multiple inits to be installed at once, and I'm not
> sure why you would want that. I also don't see the point in
> determining the default database or http server, as those don't cause
> nearly as many issues as init does.
>
> September 19, 2019 5:49 AM, "Bardot Jérôme"
> <bardot.jerome@???> wrote:
>
>> I think the better approch should be insert several package with
>> -initsystemname in debian with a conf file for the system with
>>

[cut]

Well at least one response. Hopefully more.

And a request . . . could you please use plain text instead of html
email in your posts?