On 08/09/19 07:37, fsmithred via Dng wrote:
> On 9/7/19 1:33 PM, Ismael L. Donis Garcia wrote:
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "fsmithred via Dng"
>> <dng@???>
>> To: "dng" <dng@???>
>> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2019 9:23 AM
>> Subject: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll)
>>
>>
>>> In ascii, udisks2 has been devuanized to remove a dependency on
>>> libpam-systemd (and maybe libsystemd0, too.)
>>>
>>> The version of udisks2 in beowulf is very old compared to what's in
>>> buster.
>>>
>>> The version in buster depends on libpam-systemd OR libpam-elogind.
>>> (Also libsystemd0 OR libelogind0) Since we have libpam-elogind and
>>> libelogind0 in the repos, we don't really need to devuanize udisks2
>>> anymore. Do we?
>>>
>>> Does anyone use udisks2 who doesn't want libpam-elogind or
>>> libelogind0 with it?
>>>
>>> fsmithred (looking to reduce the work load)
>>>
>>
>> I use udisks2, but I also use libpam-elogind and libelogind0
>>
>> Right now I am needing this update to install other packages.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> -- 
>> Ismael
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Things are moving slowly now, and I have no idea when we will get the
> newer version into the repo. For now, I suggest you download udisks2 and
> libudisks2-0 from packages.debian.org and install them manually.
> https://packages.debian.org/buster/udisks2
>
> If you wait for us, you'll get the exact same packages, only it will be
> later.
>
> fsmithred

fsmithred - do we need to drop udisks2 forked package from unstable and
beowulf?


--
Daniel Reurich
Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd.
021 797 722