On 9/4/19 5:41 AM, Mark Hindley wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:24:06AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:16:40PM -0400, fsmithred wrote:
>>> Why do we repackage udisks2? The version in beowulf and ceres is way behind
>>> everything else.
>>
>> I think it is because debian's version depends on libpam-systemd. Now devuan's
>> libpam-elogind provides libpam-systemd it may be possible to use upstream
>> directly. I will have a go.
>
> I have just installed debian's udisks2 and libudisks2-0 from buster (version
> 2.8.1-4) into a beowulf VM. Other than having to apt -f install to pull in the
> rest of the necessary dependencies it installs fine and basic testing is OK.
>
> So, I tentatively suggest we could drop devuan's fork of udisks2. Anybody else
> care to verify?
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________

I was going to try the same in a beowulf VM I haven't used in over a
month, and I discovered that I already had the buster version installed.
No packages with systemd in the name are installed.

apt-cache depends udisks2=2.8.1-4
udisks2...

   Depends: libpam-systemd
     libpam-elogind

Looks like we're good to go with that.

fsmithred