On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:24:06AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:16:40PM -0400, fsmithred wrote:
> > Why do we repackage udisks2? The version in beowulf and ceres is way behind
> > everything else.
>
> I think it is because debian's version depends on libpam-systemd. Now devuan's
> libpam-elogind provides libpam-systemd it may be possible to use upstream
> directly. I will have a go.

I have just installed debian's udisks2 and libudisks2-0 from buster (version
2.8.1-4) into a beowulf VM. Other than having to apt -f install to pull in the
rest of the necessary dependencies it installs fine and basic testing is OK.

So, I tentatively suggest we could drop devuan's fork of udisks2. Anybody else
care to verify?

Mark