On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 12:19:02PM +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote:

> On 05/06/19 11:46, Ivan J. wrote:
> >> - 2019-06-05 (rrq) CI needs hands-on; the slim build is hanging waithing for "armel" host
> >>    - or maybe slim needs interrupt and a new push?

> >
> > I will attend this. I was planning to decomission our LIME2 boards for
> > building and making virtual machines on our Arm64 host machine. The
> > arm64 machine has four cores and more RAM so it will result in faster
> > builds as well.
> >
> Will it still be faster doing simultaneous builds of arm64 armel and
> armhf? If so, then go for it. If not then keep the lime2 boards, if at
> all possible.

It will be the same, if not faster. Currently for the LIME2 boards,
their hard drives are served with ATA-over-Ethernet rather than
standalone. The CPU of the arm64 server is a lot faster than LIME2 as
well.

> > I'm unsure if the build will timeout or not. But feel free to abort the
> > build for now.
> The build for that architecture will need to be killed to allow the job
> to complete.