Hi Didier,

On 28/4/19 22:59, Didier Kryn wrote:
>     Thanks a lot Aitor.
>
>     In the mean time I've found a bug which should cause memory leak
> and possible segfault. I'll do a few checks and push the corrected
> version asap.
>
>     Didier


On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 17:04 +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:

> On 26/11/2015 15:00, Svante Signell wrote:
>> Hi, what's wrong with plain GNU make, and the GNU auto-tools?
> Nothing is wrong with "plain make", providing that it meets your needs.
> But often you want more than plain make can offer. There's plenty to
> criticise with the autotools, the baroque complexity being the primary
> one. CMake is a big upgrade from the autotools; it's vastly more
> featureful and powerful, has better portability for modern systems, and
> still works with make when generating Makefiles. The autotools have
> failed to keep up to date with modern portability requirements; the
> capabilities CMake has to offer are unmatched at the present time,
> though it also has its own warts. After 15 years of autotools use, I
> converted all my stuff to CMake over the last two years, and I'm not
> looking back.
What about the use of CMake?
I can help on that, and also in the translations.

Aitor.