ITT, people are forgetting the earth wasn’t designed to house augmented
humans.

The side effects of technology use (ICTs) is largely unknown. We may be
directly destroying our planet to utilize technology or we may not be
harming anything at all.

With that said, when we are no longer fully human, what does that mean for
the planet and the pollutants we already release.

Logically, more machines means more emissions. Whether they be fossil fuels
or some other pollutant I don’t give a shit about.

My opinion, as long as I have cybernetic capabilities and the option to
live a more “robust” existence, I don’t give two shits about the earth or
the pollutants.

The nerds like Turing and Von Neumann should have had the foresight to
account for a world with more digital intelligence than biological and the
chemical byproducts of making/using computers.

With that said, we can thank third world countries for making the oceans
brown and thank large US cities for having miles of trash in the oceans as
well. Ever flew over the Atlantic from Miami? Trash for tens of miles in
the water.

A little food for thought if you live in the US, over 95% of the population
has PFAS (perflouroalkyl substances) melded into their body. Whatever makes
the eggs not stick to the pan, amirite?

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 7:45 AM Spencer Rhodes <spencer.d.rhodes@???>
wrote:

> I haven't interacted with any of them, and they've only been on my radar
> for about a month now.
>
> Just another doomsday cult.
>
> Doomsday cults are far from new, but this pseudo-science climate change
> version has been gaining traction.
>
> As the Western population became more educated and scientifically
> inclined, (industrialization, public education, mass-production of books)
> the old doomsday cult of Abrahamic Religion started losing it's hold.
>
> So, you have to tell people the world is going to end in pseudo-scientific
> terms instead of mythological terms now.
>
> Then you have a generation of young people that are so fucking dumb or so
> self-focused that you can't even hold their attention long enough to
> explain these psudo-scientific terms to them. So, you dumb it down even
> more and re-brand it as something edgy and cool.
>
> From their website:
> [image: The Truth Extinction Rebellion Extinction Rebellion.png]
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 3:42 AM Alexander Ross <maillist_unsystem@???>
> wrote:
>
>> Wondering what people on this group think of them. seams like a more
>> productive protest effort. only managed to walk around waterloo bridge
>> in the evening on sat 22rd, that night it was cleared. So not seen much
>> in person. Nor was there much going on by that time.
>>
>> Experiences?
>> Opinions?
>> Feedback?
>>
>> What your currently or intending or wishing to do instead to see
>> progress in world?
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>