Le 12/04/2019 à 17:24, Hendrik Boom a écrit :
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:41:53AM +0200, Antony Stone wrote:
>> On Friday 12 April 2019 at 00:53:40, Steve Litt wrote:
>>
>>> I suggest we pass the following resolution:
>>>
>>> =======================================================
>>> At Devuan we prioritize benefits to individual users over benefits to
>>> corporations. Within the overarching umbrella of delivering
>>> sans-systemd GNU/Linux systems, we seek to make life fun for
>>> developers, caretakers, and all other contributors.
>>> =======================================================
>> Do we want to emphasise purely "sans-systemd", or do we want to promote
>> "freedom of init choice"?
> The problem with the phrase "freedom of init choice" is that it appears
> to say that one could choose systemd.
>
> We need to be clear that we are promoting freedom by providing
> alternatives to systemd, and that users that choose systemd can
> use Debian with our blessing.

    If I can add my 2 cents, I would say that the absenceof init choice
is the emerged part of systemd. Systemd is not an init system, it is a
massive threat to freedom all over the Linux OS. I think we all agree on
this in the Devuan community, and this might be advertised.

            Didier