On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:24:39AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:41:53AM +0200, Antony Stone wrote:
> > Do we want to emphasise purely "sans-systemd", or do we want to promote
> > "freedom of init choice"?
>
> The problem with the phrase "freedom of init choice" is that it appears
> to say that one could choose systemd.
>
> We need to be clear that we are promoting freedom by providing
> alternatives to systemd, and that users that choose systemd can
> use Debian with our blessing.

I think it could be good to not only leave vestigial systemd support in, but
also make both code paths working. This would create nice upstreamable
patches, and dispel any views of being hostile.


Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Did ya know that typing "test -j8" instead of "ctest -j8"
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ will make your testsuite pass much faster, and fix bugs?
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀