I just got availability confirmed for that space in xberg that I mentioned.
It’s a nice space. Do we want it or we have something else in mind?
On Wed 20. Feb 2019 at 21:07, ksenia bellman <k@???> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Hey @almereyda thanx a lot for taking a lead on the next squatconf, really
> hugely appreciated! (I was contemplating doin something squatconfy, but got
> a bit lazy). I'm in.
>
> Just put some notes in the old pad here:
> https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/1/edit/xycHT+u8OGdeJRIIKex2Fg/pbEcO53RTIviklwNRLpcujfP/ > can use this for now, unless you have other preferred means of comms.
> Made a suggestion in there to have a week long Squatconf. Cuz DTN is a
> pretty divey event in itself and I'd like to attend. Yet I'd love to take
> part in the Squatconf as well. I'm up for clearing up the whole week for
> the Squatconf.
> I couldn't find squatconf on freenode btw, does it still exist?
>
> @Dmytri Kleiner <dk@???> do you still have access to that lovely
> space you hosted a little event with federated wiki Ward, or should we look
> for more locations? I have a potential location in xberg available 24/7
> with chairs, projector, fridge and stuff.
>
> Adding my contacts cuz I keep missing my emails:
> Telegram: @j328044
> Signal: +49 1520 6068091
>
> Another suggestion: whoever is in Berlin we can try to get together IRL
> sometime next week & chat about Squatconf, check out the potential venue
> etc.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 14:37, Dmytri Kleiner <dk@???> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hey all, yeah, we want to do something focused on venture communism and
>> counterantidisintermediationism, conversations that substack, dominic,
>> feross and others have been casually involved with in the past.
>>
>> We would host in our space[^1], and it would be a facilitated
>> discussion, with no audience, only participants, using our
>> "international" style of facilitation.
>>
>> Probably about a dozen to so people, 4 to 6 hours. Whatever day is best
>> for the participants is good for us.
>> We like to be open, but would focus on making progress and forging
>> alliances in this session, so would prefer to work with people who are
>> already favorable to the work of Telekommunisten, venture communism,
>> etc, self-identify as left/socialists, are are at least potentially
>> interested in working in solidarity with Marxist mass movements in the
>> global south.
>>
>> If there are people who are interested, but unsure about their feelings
>> about our political orientation, we could do a Commie Curious
>> session[^2] for a more a more general audience.
>>
>> If there was also a SquatConf in parallel to DTN, Telekommunisten would
>> be happy to contribute to that with presentations and/or facilitated
>> discssions as well.
>>
>> Not sure if I'll attend DTN, but really excited about having you all in
>> town, lets make the most of it!
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> [1] We've moved since last time, so not the same as the old space, a bit
>> smaller.
>> [2] We have hosted Commie Curious sessions the last two years at CCC.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2019-02-18 00:49, Dominic Tarr wrote:
>> > I am sure it's cool to have a squatconf alongside DTN!
>> >
>> > Btw, the telecommunistas are wanting to organize something too. I'm
>> > not sure what scale they are talking though, I'm not sure if it's
>> > whole day or just a evening, anyway recommend pinging dmytri
>> > https://twitter.com/dmytri >> >
>> > On 2/17/19, Jérôme Loï <gorhgorh@???> wrote:
>> >> Hey hey, it was nice to have you here ;)
>> >>
>> >> About Squatconf / DTN, sounds like a fun thing to do, and lots of the
>> >> usual
>> >> suspects will be at DTN anyway.
>> >>
>> >> On my side I'm not sure to attend as the dates are colliding with
>> >> something
>> >> already planned, and I don't have
>> >> the resources/will to pay / beg for a 200 ish euro conf ticket. but
>> >> come for
>> >> something before / after is probably doable.
>> >>
>> >> About the WS, i lost the domain (you need a valid credit card for
>> >> theses
>> >> things ... it seems ...)
>> >> but I do have the git repo somewhere, and it was hosted in Joepie's
>> >> git
>> >> server (and probably still is),
>> >> I'll look for that and give you access.
>> >>
>> >> As for "squatting" DTN, this is another debate as i don't think we
>> >> should
>> >> try to make shadow to an event
>> >> that is already helping us (they probably will help Dominic and James
>> >> coming
>> >> to Berlin, etc, etcà) as well as
>> >> gathering pll that would be interested by theses discutions.
>> >>
>> >> I would favour something before / after the event, rather that
>> >> something
>> >> close and happening at the same time.
>> >>
>> >> Let see where this leads...
>> >>
>> >> See you all soon i hope
>> >>
>> >> Jérôme
>> >>
>> >>> On 15 Feb 2019, at 18:35, almereyda <almereyda@???> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi SquatConf!
>> >>>
>> >>> It's been a pleasure running into folks around FOSDEM and afterwards!
>> >>> Thanks to Caleb for an inspiring conversational flow, to Aaron for
>> >>> continuing the discussions we commenced elsewhere, and to Jérome for
>> >>> hosting me the last night. It feels good to reconnect to the network
>> >>> at
>> >>> times.
>> >>>
>> >>> Is there anyone who would like to participate in a SquatConf in
>> >>> parallel
>> >>> to Data Terra Nemo 2 https://dtn.is?
>> >>>
>> >>> This happens on the weekend of May 17 - 18 in Berlin.
>> >>>
>> >>> Hence SquatConf belongs to no one, I'm seeing a chance it can fulfill
>> >>> its role as a fringe event to preparations of others. Last week we
>> >>> ran
>> >>> into a discussion about the prices of dtn.is through
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> which made me think if it wouldn't be appropriate to take over the
>> >>> dates
>> >>> and present further realities and contexts to distribution. For this
>> >>> I
>> >>> am starting conversation with the venue, if they can offer free space
>> >>> in
>> >>> a cafe next to the river, and with a wagon place nearby.
>> >>>
>> >>> The latter could make use of a nice Freifunk WiFi installation ...
>> >>>
>> >>> Does anybody know what happened to http://squatconf.eu/ ? Seems its
>> >>> maintenance got individualised and the collective couldn't keep it
>> >>> up?
>> >>>
>> >>> The last version resides in
>> >>> http://web.archive.org/web/20160317122026/http://squatconf.eu/ >> >>>
>> >>> Since https://github.com/squatconf doesn't have the sources
>> >>> available,
>> >>> I'm also interested in knowing who might retain a copy of the git
>> >>> tree?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks in advance for any opinions,
>> >>>
>> >>> yala / Jon
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Squatconf mailing list
>> >>> Squatconf@???
>> >>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/squatconf >> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Squatconf mailing list
>> >> Squatconf@???
>> >> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/squatconf >> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Squatconf mailing list
>> > Squatconf@???
>> > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/squatconf >>
>> --
>> Dmytri Kleiner
>>
>> http://dmytri.info >> @dmytri
>> _______________________________________________
>> Squatconf mailing list
>> Squatconf@???
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/squatconf >>
>