On 2018年10月23日 9:10:59 JST, wirelessduck@??? wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 07:37, Rick Moen <rick@???> wrote:
>> The mainstream choices (disregarding journald) in 2018 are rsyslog
>and
>> syslog-ng, period. A case could be made for either. I _think_
>> rsyslog remains more common. I've personally only encountered
>> syslog-ng in embedded logging appliances manufactured by Hungarian
>firm
>> Balabit, which also is the primary code maintainer for the open
>source
>> codebase, offering an enhanced proprietary version to customers.
>> Consequently, syslog-ng can be considered a case of 'open core' in
>the
>> sense that syslog-ng is always at risk of being the disregarded
>> stepchild because more effort is put into the proprietary 'Premium
>Edition'.
>> (This is part of the reason I personally continue to favour rsyslog,
>> but not vehemently.)
>>
>> 2007 comparison:
>>
>https://web.archive.org/web/20170612021518/http://blog.gerhards.net/2007/08/why-does-world-need-another-syslogd.html
>
>Even Poettering recommends rsyslog for some use cases
>
>https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/1291
>
>--Tom

Hi,

by the way, what do u think about
what is written on that page regarding
logging?

http://jdebp.eu./FGA/unix-daemon-design-mistakes-to-avoid.html

I was thinking if there is a better
way of logging,
might be worth to try it.

ciao,