Now isn't it a gift of god that devuan is outside good owns country, is it?

Am Montag, 24. September 2018 schrieb gratuitouslicensesarerevocable@???:
> better to bury a corpse than to let it rot in the air.****
> > This is legally nonsense. The only way I can revoke someone's rights
> > to
>
> It is not nonsense. Gratuitous licenses are and always have been
> revocable at the will of the grantor.
>
> (Yes, I am a lawyer)
>
> Property law 101.
> "But this is COPYRIGHT"
> From the US statute: copyright is alienable in the same way property is.
> That's where you acquire they ability to license your work in the USA;
> congress' copyright act.
> Prior to the Statute of Anne there was no copyright what-so-ever. It's a
> statutory right.
> The statute grants the right to alienate said right(s), and, the
> drafters not feeling the need to re-invent the wheel, simply declared
> that the operation there-of would be by the established law of property.
>
>
> > In short, "unconditionedwitness", please shut up. You're not helping.
> I am informing those who are being threatened with expulsion about their
> rights and what steps they can take against their enemies.
> Matthew Garret claims your "consent" is immaterial (on the lwn thread).
> He is wrong. The contributors must be kept happy.
>
> You (providing you are the copyright holder to your own code) can revoke
> at any time.
> There is nothing between you, and putting your detractors to task...
> except for your force of will and some paperwork.
>
> ****
> > Moreover, even if I _could_ revoke the license, I wouldn't want to do
> > so; it would be ridiculously petty in itself and the precedent it
> > would
> > set would be destructive to the entire open-source community, about
> > which I care deeply. It is _because_ Linux and other open-source
> > projects are so important to humanity that I spoke up about what I
> > perceive as a threat to it.
>
> You and others are being threatened with sanction by people such as
> Matthew Garret if you do not obey their diktats.
> They say essentially: if you want to contribute to opensource (haha 30k
> projects have CoCs now!) you will be BARRED from doing so if you do not
> obey our religion (anglo-americanism).
>
> If you're not a feminist: you're sanctioned (punished)
> If you're not opposed to men marrying female children (a practice
> permitted by YHWH in Devarim chapter 22, vers 28 (na'ar), aswell as by
> Sunni Islam), you are punished.
> If you are not polite to women you are punished.
> If you speak out of turn you are punished.
>
> Yet they continue to use your code while spitting on you and besmerching
> your name.
> While making sure you are forgotten if you step out of line.
>
> (You do the work. They take your work. They try to harm you and reduce
> your civil rights. Sound like anything familiar... (c.p.t.l.i.s.m))
>
> You must respect women who do NOTHING for you and even NOTHING for
> anyone else except exist as a USELESS physical entity (females who are
> not sweet young brides for men or mothers and just consume are not
> useful for anyone other than themselves: the purpose of females is to
> create more human beings and to bring happiness and pleasures to men:
> they are superfluous in any other capacity, as a class)...
> who rules over you ...
> or else you are punished.
>
> You slaved away writing the code.
> When they feel they don't need you anymore they seek to tear you down.
>
> You have a remedy: Recind the grant.
> You did NOT sign away your OWNERSHIP of the code you wrote.
>
> The anglo-american belief system is that males are to be slaves of women
> and their masters.
> This belief system is now being imposed on even hobbies like gratis
> software development.
> They wish to give men no refuge, no place to build something outside the
> eye of the middle-class ("white" or english) woman.
> To keep men checked and obedient at all time in all things.
>
> But there is a way to strike back, to strike at the heart.
> There is a dagger at the neck of that which you built but is now being
> repurposed to bind you.
> All you have to do is push.
> Such is all any rights-holder has to do.
>
> Gratuitous licenses are revocable at will.
>
>
> On 2018-09-20 22:57, Edward Cree wrote:
> > On 20/09/18 10:27, unconditionedwitness@??? wrote:
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>



--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA, CIA ...