On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 01:29:33 +0200, Alessandro wrote in message
<20180731012933.04fec274@???>:

> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 09:39:14 +0200
> Arnt Karlsen <arnt@???> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > ..a luxury we can afford once we know which trick the enemy is
> > going to play on us. Meanwhile we're lucky if we waste no more
> > than 2/3 of our ammo on our bad guesses. The cost of getting on
> > with life. ;o)
>
> Precisely because we barely have enough resources to concentrate on
> real-life threats, it's stew-peed wasting a lot of time and effort on
> hypothetical ones that border on the paranoia rather than residing
> within the range of possibilities.

..either way, we are going to waste "ammo" on our bad guesses.
Deal with "it" (them bad guesses) and move on.

--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.