On 26-07-18 18:00, Basati wrote:
> I would like to recall that RedHat is a company of the American military
> complex. With close relations with civil intelligence and the military of the
> United States
>
> I acknowledge that I used this argument with the DGN trap prior to the fork.
>
> My opinion has not changed systemd is a troll horse not yet activated. When it
> is impossible to remove and has thousands and thousands of lines of code that
> make it very difficult to audit. They'll open the back door.
>
> For 30 years they have not been able to cope with linux systems. They come and
> go as they please on the windows.
>
> The article is clearly biased. It lies and does the same thing that was done
> in debian to obviate the underlying reason.
>
> We don't have the resources or the contacts to fight this battle.
>
> But we have something much more powerful. We have devuan, its very existence
> is already a resistance. As the number of developers and users increases
> little by little. It will strengthen us to deal with this.
>
> But they can do NOTHING, we are the ones who DO.
>
> I honestly don't think we should waste time with these propaganda anti devuan
> actions by redhat. I'm convinced they're behind the article. It's their
> specialty that they know how to intoxicate.
>
> Basati
>


I am not into conspiracy theories and keep it simple:
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/why.html and then ask why the hell does
someone wants a init system to do all this stuff? Easy answer: latest
row in table on that page "Easily writable, extensible and parseable
service files, suitable for manipulation with enterprise management
tools" which is not by coincidence the main business of Red Hat.

Grtz.

Nick