On Thursday 26 July 2018 at 17:16:56, Эльбрус Кондратьев wrote:

> It's called 'herd behavior'. Someone told them that systemd constituted
> 'the way to go'. Nevermind if that way results irrational.

Oh well, at least it wasn't Hurd behaviour, otherwise we wouldn't have an
Operating System at all...

Antony.

> On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 10:49 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 07:13:52 -0400
> >
> > Hendrik Boom <hendrik@???> wrote:
> > > I found this article online.
> > >
> > > https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/debian-without-systemd-devuan/
> >
> > I could have swapped the phrase "s6 plus s6-rc" for "systemd" and that
> > entire video would have been true except the part that says if you're
> > using Enterprise Linux, you're stuck with systemd.
> >
> > Can I ask all of you something? How do people, who call themselves
> > developers, joyfully embrace a false choice like systemd vs sysvinit?
> > Do these same "developers" neglect to put in error handling for a bad
> > value, because the program earlier supposedly set the variable to one
> > of two correct values?
> >
> > I found this video particularly obnoxious.
> >
> > SteveT

--
I own three Windows books, published by O'Reilly. They are "Windows
Annoyances", "Office 97 Annoyances" and "Windows 98 Annoyances". That pretty
much sums it up for me.

                                                   Please reply to the list;
                                                         please *don't* CC me.