:: Re: [DNG] Unswapping interface name…
トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Hendrik Boom
日付:  
To: dng
古いトピック: Re: [DNG] Unswapping interface namesRe: (WAS: what has gone wrong with networking in ascii?
題目: Re: [DNG] Unswapping interface names
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:32:10AM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 15/07/2018 à 20:37, Hendrik Boom a écrit :
> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 02:27:26PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:41:21PM +0200, Udo Hennig wrote:
> > > > I get some trouble with the network after updating to ascii and
> > > > rebooting too on two computers. I found some messages in dmesg like
> > > >
> > > > Cannot rename eth0 to eth1, name already in use
> > > > Cannot rename eth2 to eth0, name already in use
> > > >
> > > > It looks like udev change the name of the devices.
> > > That seems to be what happened here.
> > >
> > > > I solved this editing
> > > > the /etc/roules.d/peresist.rules and use names like nic0, nic1. And I
> > > > changed the /etc/networking/interfaces to the new names.
> > > Those files done't seem to exists in my /etc.
> > But there is a /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
> > so I'll try editing that.
> >
>
>     I got the feeling that those /etc/udev files are ignored nowadays.
> Therefore better hack in /lib/udev. But, if you disable interface renaming
> in the kernel command arguments, this hack will have no effect.


Editing that file worked, so evidently it wasn't ignored. Is it likely
to be ignored in the future? Is there another mechanism I should be
looking into? Will vdev or eudev (or any other expected *dev) do things
differently?

-- hendrik

>
>         Didier
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng