On 04/06/2018 at 12:44, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 11:55:57AM +0200, Alessandro Selli wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 at 11:49:47 +0200
>> KatolaZ <katolaz@???> wrote:
>>
>>> The most probable outcome is that a new alternative will possibly
>>> emerge. And no, gitlab is not the one, IMHO.
>>
>> Why not?
>>
>> I do think a more modern solution would be a distributed p2p repository
>> based on a keychain, but a classic, centralized repo like GitLab is probably
>> much easier to the vast majority of coders (and users, too). Besides the
>> fact that there is not one currently available TIKO.
>>
>
> The main limit of Gitlab is the fact that it depends on rails. And
> rails is not meant for scalability, IMHO. Whoever has ever run a
> Gitlab instance for more than 10 users and 50 repos knows what I am
> talking about.

People are soon going to find out:
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/technology/gitlab-sees-huge-traffic-spike-after-news-of-microsoft-buying-github/

«GitLab Sees Huge Traffic Spike After News of Microsoft Buying GitHub»


Alessandro