I have Virtualbox working on freebsd.

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 7:52 AM, J. Fahrner <jf@???> wrote:

> Am 2018-03-14 21:29, schrieb Chillfan:
>
>> Just as a precursor to this.. I don't consider freebsd an alternative
>> to Devuan partly because of freedom related issues since they're happy
>> to accept binary only drivers there.
>>
>
> I have no problem with binary drivers. I am not an ideologist. I like the
> concept that Kernel and User Land are of one piece. Everything centrally
> coordinated, no wild growth as under Linux. Of course, they adapt many
> things from the Linux world, because otherwise many software just would not
> run. Basically, I think BSD is much better. In real operation, however,
> there are 2 problems: many laptop functions are still immature, e.g.
> Suspend / Resume, and the software offering is even worse than under Linux.
> For example, there is no Virtualbox or VMware Player, which is important to
> me for a few Windows programs that do not exist for Linux.
>
> Jochen
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>