:: Re: [DNG] pam_limits or limits.conf…
Góra strony
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: KatolaZ
Data:  
Dla: dng
Temat: Re: [DNG] pam_limits or limits.conf different from Debian?
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 02:13:15PM +1300, Patrick Dunford wrote:
> No red flags for any of that stuff
>
> On a Debian Buster VM where the increased file limit put into limits.conf
> obviously works, the result of ulimit -n comes out the same 1024 as on my
> Devuan VM.
>
> The subtleties of why one distro would use one mechanism and a similar one a
> different mechanism (apparently) are all the things that frustrate people
> like me :)
>


The thing is that I guess Devuan ASCII has not (willingly) changed any
default in that respect, so the same problem might be present in
debian stretch.

This post:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46441602/how-to-change-open-files-ulimit-n-permanently-for-normal-user-in-debian-stret

suggests that libpam-systemd seems to ignore /etc/security/limits.conf
by default. The easy way to check is by logging in from a tty, and
looking at:

$ ulimit -n

I tried it now, setting nofile to 20000, and it correctly shows the
new value. Which polkit backend are you using? We might have inherited
an unwanted behaviour in libpam-elogind, possibly.

HND

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[     "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[       @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[     @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]