:: Re: [DNG] Debian systemd arrogance
Etusivu
Poista viesti
Vastaa
Lähettäjä: Arnt Karlsen
Päiväys:  
Vastaanottaja: dng
Aihe: Re: [DNG] Debian systemd arrogance
On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 10:54:27 +0100, Klaus wrote in message
<20180218095426.GA13799@???>:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi,
>
> I just found today the post[0] of Petter Reinholdtsen, one of the
> sysvinit maintainer of debian.
>
> While I agree that it is good that they migrate to git, I hear the
> arrogance in "and there probably will be until systemd start working
> on Hurd and FreeBSD." and "Surprising as it might sound, there are
> still computers using the traditional Sys V init system"
>
> Regards
>    Klaus

>
> [0]
> http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/The_SysVinit_upstream_project_just_migrated_to_git.html


..no real news here, just one of many precedents:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonderabteilung_Lola


..only 2 real question here, 1., _what_is_really_ behind all this
systemd "arrogance", are they trying to help the free world by e.g.
coming up with an alternative to e.g. Tor, or, are they trying to
defeat us all by e.g. subversion of e.g. Tor, by going in between
kernelspace and userspace?

..and my guess is we are not going to learn the truth in 2018 either,
we can only "hope" to see hints wherever computers are used for
important things, like in e.g. the mid-term elections etc...


..the other real question here, is, why are the Norwegian etc
NATO and EU governments, so secretive on "the Rinnan Gang"?

..if e.g. Muslims learned about it, they would be able to see how
closely al-Qaeda, ISIL, al-Shabaab, Boko Haram etc compares to
"the Rinnan Gang", they "only" harm Muslims nowadays, just like
"the Rinnan Gang" "only" harmed Norwegians during WWII.

..the secrecy comes with _exactly_ the same "arrogant" zeal,
"National Security!!!"-style, in both these 2 cases.

--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.