On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:05:31AM +0100, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:

[cut]

>
> It would help if we have a definition of stable. And to attract people for
> larger scale testing maybe we should release a "official" beta.
>

The definition of stable is always the same: "Without known
release-critical bugs". Then other distros have their own personal
interpretation of "stable", which include stuff that is not even of
beta quality, but that's another story.

I guess it's better to call something "beta" and then realise that it
could have been called "stable", rather than the opposite.

HND

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[     "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[       @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[     @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]